On the 4th of July 1946, a number of former concentration camp guards who worked at the brutal Stutthof concentration camp were dragged out in front of 20,000 people. They were led towards one of five sets of huge gallows, in which would bring their lives to an end. At the end of World War II, there were many men who were condemned in front of war crimes trials, and they were then executed for their evil actions, which included sending thousands of people to the gas chambers.
There were six men in total that day in Gdansk, alongside five women, who were all executed. And this included the former commandant of Stutthof, a camp very close to the gallows. That day the condemned were helped onto the back of a truck when the noose was then placed around their necks, and as the trucks slowly drove off, they were then left to hang.
However, why specifically did the executions take place in such a very public way? Stutthof concentration camp was known for its ruthlessness and brutality. And during the Second World War, it became a place where thousands of people lost their lives at the hands of the SS guards. In total, around 65,000 people lost their lives at Stutthof and within its subcamps due to the intense labor conditions, disease epidemics, starvation, and at the hands of the murderous and brutal guards.
There was a gas chamber within the camp, too, and those who were not fit enough to work were then sent in there, and they were killed being driven in by the guards. Conditions were extremely harsh, and this was made worse by the guard force. There were even some claims that corpses at Stutthof were even used to produce soap within the Third Reich.
At the end of the Second World War, a number of guards who worked at Stutthof concentration camp were arrested after they tried to flee and they were then brought to the Stutthof trials. Amongst the defendants were a number of female guards, but also the former commandant of the guard force. This included Johann Pauls, a man who was an ardent Nazi and who had been part of the political movement since 1931 and he was a very experienced guard who worked at many other sites.
There were also a number of kapos who were tried. These were different to Pauls as they were actually technically prisoners who had been given specific duties and powers to then lord over the inmates. Kapos were universally despised by the larger prisoner population and when many of the camps were liberated, the kapos were beaten to death.
Those male guards and kapos who were sentenced to death at the first Stutthof trial were Johann Pauls, Today is Kobzinski, Walter Kozlowski, Joseph Reiter, Franciszek Szopinski and Jan Braucht. On the 4th of July, 1946, the condemned Stutthof guards and kapos were taken to Biskupia Gorka Hel in Gdansk and they were led out in front of a crowd of 20,000 people.
Businessmen even sold food and drinks and it was almost a medieval form of public entertainment. One by one, the women were executed first and then the men were then executed. They were helped onto the back of a number of trucks which were placed under the huge gallows which had been built. Everyone was able to have a good view of the proceedings and after being helped onto the trucks, the death sentences were read out by an official.
The executioner who was a former prisoner of the camp was the one who actually secured the noose and then after this, the truck drove off forward and then the noose snapped taut and the Schutzstaffel guards were left swinging on the gallows. It was death by slow strangulation and they began to kick and fight, but minutes later their bodies went limp.
But why was this such a public execution and hanging? Public execution was chosen partly because of the legal and political atmosphere in post-war Europe. Authorities believed that visible punishment would reinforce the legitimacy of the judicial process and demonstrate that Nazi crimes would not be hidden or ignored.
The occupation had involved secrecy, propaganda, and widespread denial. So, public accountability carried symbolic importance. The executions were therefore presented as the final stage of a lawful judicial process rather than an act of revenge, even though emotions surrounding the events were intense. The emotional dimension of the executions cannot be separated from their public nature.
Polish society was deeply traumatized, and rightly so, by years of occupation, terror, and genocide. Many individuals who attended the executions that day were former prisoners themselves. They were relatives of victims or residents who had witnessed wartime brutality firsthand. For them, the hangings represented a moment of moral vindication and also closure.
The public spectacle also served as collective acknowledgement of the suffering and a visible repudiation of Nazi rule. Now, hanging was selected as the method of execution because it was a traditional form of civilian execution and capital punishment in Poland. This choice also carried symbolic meaning, distinguishing the condemned as criminals rather than soldiers who might otherwise face execution by firing squads.
The gallows were created on Biskupia Górka Hill in Gdańsk, a location that could accommodate large crowds, and this ensured the executions would be widely witnessed. Some accounts indicate that former prisoners were allowed to participate symbolically in the process, highlighting the theme of justice being carried out in the name of the victims.
Advertisements
The public hangings of the Stutthof guards reflect though a broader pattern of immediate post-war justice across Eastern Europe. In the chaotic aftermath of liberation, many governments used highly visible trials and executions to establish authority and respond to public demand for accountability. These events were intended not only to punish perpetrators, but also to deter denial and reinforce collective memory of the Nazi crimes.
However, attitudes towards public executions soon began to change with concerns emerging that such spectacles risked blurring the lines between justice and vengeance. By the late 1940s and 1950s, public executions became less common as governments shifted towards more controlled forms of capital punishment, or they abolished public execution altogether.
In Western Europe especially, there was a growing discomfort that turning punishment into public spectacle was wrong. As a result, the Stutthof executions represent a rather transitional moment in legal and social history between wartime trauma and evolving post-war norms surrounding justice and human rights.
So, to sum up, the guards and the male guards of Stutthof were publicly hanged because, well, they were convicted of grave war crimes and because the Polish authorities sought a visible demonstration of justice in the wake of immense national suffering. The country had suffered a huge amount during World War II.
And let’s remember that the invasion of Poland began the whole of the conflict. The executions of Stutthof guards reflected legal aims of accountability, political goals of reaffirming state authority, and emotional desires for closure amongst survivors and the wider population. While controversial in hindsight, these public hangings were shaped by the extraordinary circumstances of the immediate post-war period, and they remain a stark example of how societies confronted the legacy of Nazi atrocities.
The men who were hanged that day were known for their evil and brutality. And many of them were former prisoners who had been given power to commit absolutely terrible crimes. These were hated by the prisoners themselves. And there would have been people that day who witnessed the executions who had been punished brutally by the very men who were hanging from the gallows.
Thanks for watching. If you did find this video interesting, maybe click subscribe. Once again, thank you so much for watching one of these videos.
