Posted in

At 89, Morgan Freeman First time Talks about Tim Robbins D

Get busy living, or get busy dying. Thirty years. That one line has outlived   every award the film ever won. People quote it on  street corners, in break rooms, in the quiet hours   when life feels like it has stopped moving. Most  of them couldn’t name the director. Some couldn’t   even tell you the full title. But every single one  of them remembers the voice that delivered it.

That voice belonged to Morgan Freeman. And  the man he was standing across from in that   prison yard — the man he had to make you  believe he had known for twenty years in the   space of a single afternoon — was Tim Robbins. What those two men built together in the summer of   1993, inside the walls of a real Ohio reformatory,  became the highest-rated film in the history of   cinema. Not when it came out. Not even close.

It took years — quiet years, cable television,   word of mouth passed between ordinary people who  had no reason to care about Hollywood — before the   world caught up to what they had made. At 88, Morgan Freeman has finally begun   to talk about what those months really cost.  What it meant to wait fifty years for a role   that required everything his life had made him.

To understand why Shawshank meant what it meant   to Morgan Freeman, you have to understand what the  fifty years before it actually looked like. This   is not a story that begins in triumph. It begins  in a schoolhouse in Mississippi, at age nine, when   a boy nobody much expected anything from walked  onto a makeshift stage in a school play and felt,   for the first time, that he mattered. The applause  was small.

The audience was just parents and   teachers. But Morgan Freeman would say decades  later that he fell in love with acting that day,   not because of the attention, but because for  the first time in his young life he felt like   he was seen. That feeling would carry him through  the next half century of near-constant rejection,   poverty, and the particular agony  of being talented in a world that   hadn’t yet decided it was interested. He left Mississippi.

He did a stretch in the   Air Force that taught him mostly what he didn’t  want to be. He moved to Los Angeles in 1959 with   nothing but a duffel bag, found Hollywood’s doors  closed to the kind of actor he knew himself to be,   and relocated to New York. He drove taxis. He  danced in the 1964 World’s Fair chorus. He kept   going to auditions and kept getting told  no — not always in words.

Sometimes it was   just the silence of a room after you read, the  polite thank you, the way nobody ever called.   He turned forty and the Electric Company came  along — a children’s educational show on PBS   where he played Easy Reader, making reading cool  for kindergarteners. For five years he showed up,   performed, collected a paycheck, and remained  invisible to Hollywood.

He was forty years old   and beloved by children who had no idea  their favorite TV character was a trained   Shakespearean actor who had spent two decades  trying to get someone to look at him seriously.   In 1987, at fifty years old, he got  his first Academy Award nomination,   for a small film called Street Smart in which he  played a violent pimp opposite Christopher Reeve.

The nomination came as a shock — not because the  performance wasn’t worthy, but because fifty years   is a very long time to wait for anyone to notice.  He didn’t win. The statue went to Sean Connery.   But the phone calls changed after that. And then  came 1989. Driving Miss Daisy. Glory.

Two films,   two nominations, back-to-back years, and the  belated discovery by a wider audience that this   man had been here the whole time, patient  and ready, with more craft in one scene   than most actors managed in an entire career. But the Oscar didn’t come. The nominations kept   arriving and the losses kept arriving with them,  and Morgan Freeman went home each time with the   particular grace of a man who had learned that  the world moves on its own schedule and there is   nothing useful in fighting that. He had spent  fifty years learning that lesson. A few more   award seasons were nothing. And then came the script.   He has talked about this moment with the kind of  careful honesty that makes you believe every word.

He received the script for The Shawshank  Redemption and read it from beginning to end,   and it was, in his own words, one of the best  he had ever read. Very little was changed from   that first draft to what ended up on screen. In an  industry where rewrites arrive in different colors   and every project feels like construction that  never quite finishes, here was a script so solid,   so complete in itself, that it announced its  own quality on the first page.

He read it   and he wanted to be in it. Whatever part they  had in mind for him. Whatever he could get.   What they had in mind was the lead. Not Andy  Dufresne, the wrongfully convicted banker played   by Tim Robbins at the center of the story, but Red  — Ellis Boyd Redding, the man who had been inside   so long that he had become the institution’s  memory, its conscience, its quiet heartbeat.

The narrator. The voice that would guide the  entire film. When Morgan Freeman found out that   was the role they were offering, he said something  later that carries the weight of fifty years in   it. He said: I thought — I control the movie.  He was flabbergasted. And he deserved to be.   There was one wrinkle.

He picked up the original  Stephen King novella the film was based on,   because someone sent it to him, and he opened it  and read the first page. Red, in King’s version,   was a middle-aged Irishman with greying red hair.  Morgan Freeman closed the book. He didn’t read   another line. He had no interest in playing  a man described that way, and he trusted his   instincts. What he had already read in Frank  Darabont’s screenplay was enough.

Advertisements

The spirit   of the character — a man of hard wisdom and  preserved hope, a man who had survived by going   inward and still somehow kept a light on — that  was a man Morgan Freeman could play. That was,   in some ways, a man Morgan Freeman had  been preparing to play his entire life.   Before Freeman was cast, the role of Red  had been considered for, among others,   Clint Eastwood, Harrison Ford, Paul Newman,  and Robert Redford.

What Darabont ultimately   saw in Morgan Freeman was something those names  couldn’t offer — an authoritative presence that   carried no explanation, no backstory needed. You  believed him the moment he appeared. You trusted   the voice the moment it opened. Darabont would  later say he could not see anyone else as Red.   Castle Rock producer Liz Glotzer had been  the one to suggest ignoring the novella’s   physical description entirely and simply casting  Freeman. It was, by any measure, the right call.

Principal photography began in the summer of  1993, in Mansfield, Ohio, at the Ohio State   Reformatory — a real, shuttered prison with Gothic  architecture and heavy stone walls that needed no   set dressing to feel like exactly what the story  required. The film was set in Maine, but Ohio   held the bones of it.

Morgan Freeman spent that  summer in Mansfield, sleeping, by his own account,   in a house rented from a Seventh-day Adventist  dentist, which led to at least one backyard   barbecue and eventually a tornado. He recounted  that detail later with the quiet humor of a man   who has seen enough of life to find a tornado  at a barbecue amusing rather than alarming.   The work itself was, by his account, smooth.

There  were challenges of ideas — conversations between   him and Tim Robbins and Darabont about how to play  a moment, what the scene was really asking for,   where to push and where to pull back. But  not conflict. Not difficulty of the kind   that poisons a set. What there was, instead,  was camaraderie. A cast that understood what   they had in the script and wanted to honor  it.

Morgan Freeman has described that summer   in Ohio as a good time. A delightful time, in  fact. Given the trajectory of everything that   came before and everything that came after,  the summer of 1993 in Mansfield had about it   the quality of a reprieve — a stretch of months  when the work was good and the company was good   and the material demanded the best of everyone.

One detail from that summer has been documented   in the film’s production history and says  something about the kind of professional   Morgan Freeman has always been. There is a scene  early in the film — Andy and Red’s first real   conversation in the prison yard, the scene where  Red is casually throwing a baseball as he talks,   the scene that establishes their relationship  with such apparent ease that audiences never once   question its authenticity. That scene took nine  hours to shoot. Frank Darabont wanted many takes.

He was particular about it, specific, unwilling  to move on until it was right. Morgan Freeman   threw a baseball for nine uninterrupted hours  without a complaint. He arrived on set the   next morning with his left arm in a sling. He did  not make a production of it. He just showed up.   That kind of professionalism doesn’t come  from nowhere.

It comes from fifty years   of understanding that the work is the  thing, that the scene is what you serve,   that nobody in that room is owed patience  or a good performance — you bring it because   that’s what you do. Morgan Freeman had thrown a  baseball for nine hours because Frank Darabont   needed the scene to be right. That was enough.

Tim Robbins, for his part, came to the project   with his own appreciation for what they were  making. He remembered reading that script and   feeling what Morgan felt — that it was one  of the best things he had ever encountered,   solid from page one to the last, the kind of  rare material where you put it down and feel   changed by it.

He had grown up watching Morgan  Freeman on The Electric Company, a detail that   carries its own particular poetry — the man who  was famous to kindergarteners eventually becoming   the professional that same grown child was honored  to work beside. Their dynamic on screen is one   of the most studied things in modern American  cinema, that friendship between Andy and Red,   the way it breathes across years of  shared prison yard afternoons.

What   made it work was not performance in the showy  sense. It was presence. Two men in a yard,   talking. Both of them fully there. The film came out on September 23,   1994. It did not make a sound at the box office.  The title confused people — nobody could get   Shawshank out of their mouths correctly.

It  competed that season against Forrest Gump   and Pulp Fiction and a dozen other things that  demanded attention in different and louder ways.   Morgan Freeman would later recall that people  would mangled the name in ways that were genuinely   creative. Shim-shim-shank reduction. Scum shot.  The best one, he noted with a straight face,   was shank reduction. Had they gone with that, he  suggested, it would have been a blockbuster.

But   the title stayed, and the box office reflected  the confusion. Sixteen million dollars during its   theatrical run, against a budget of twenty-five  million. A noble failure, the industry called it.   A well-made film that nobody came to see. Then something happened that has no clean   explanation in the logic of the film business.  Cable television got hold of it.

Ted Turner,   who owned Castle Rock at the time, began  airing Shawshank on his networks with what   Darabont later described as the enthusiasm of  a man who did not think it cost him anything.   He played it constantly, relentlessly, every  few nights it seemed, and slowly — then quickly,   then in a way nobody could fully track — people  started watching. And they kept watching.

And then   they told other people, quietly, in exactly the  way that Morgan Freeman had pointed out once was   the only way anything truly gets sold — word of  mouth. A working man on a New York street corner   stopping Tim Robbins to tell him what the film  had meant to him. Not a movie critic. Not someone   from the industry. Just a person who had watched  it on a Tuesday night and felt something shift.

Morgan Freeman would say years later that when he  started getting stopped on the street — when men   with jobs and callused hands and no particular  reason to care about Hollywood started pulling   him aside to say what the film had done for  them — that was when he understood they had   made something different.

Something that reached  past the mechanics of cinema into something more   essential. The friendship between Andy and  Red was part of it, he believed. Because we   don’t get enough films about genuine friendship  between adults — friendship not built around   car chases or shared enemies or the adrenaline  of crisis, but the slow, daily, chosen thing.   Two men who had found each other inside the  worst possible circumstances and decided,   without drama, to matter to each other. But there was something else, he thought.

Something about Zihuatanejo. The beach at the  end of the world that Andy Dufresne carried   in his mind for nineteen years, the place he was  always moving toward even when everything around   him said there was nowhere to go. Morgan Freeman  believed that most people carry a version of that   beach inside themselves.

Not a literal place,  but the idea that somewhere on the other side of   whatever has confined them — the bad job, the bad  marriage, the ordinary suffocating circumstances   of a life that doesn’t fit — there is a place  they are still capable of reaching. Shawshank   gave people permission to believe that. And Morgan  Freeman’s voice, steady and unhurried and true,   was the instrument that delivered that permission  directly into the ear of whoever was listening.

In 2005, at sixty-seven years old, after four  Academy Award nominations over seventeen years,   Morgan Freeman finally won the Oscar, for Million  Dollar Baby. His acceptance speech was brief,   almost uncomfortable with the attention.  He thanked everybody and anybody who had   anything to do with the making of the picture,  and his voice cracked just slightly.

Those who   understood his story knew what that statue  represented. Not just the role. Fifty years.   Every audition that went nowhere. Every year of  driving a cab and filing papers and waiting.   He is 89 years old now. The compression glove  on his left hand — the result of a car accident   in 2008 that shattered his arm and left him with  nerve damage and fibromyalgia that has never fully   quieted — goes everywhere with him. The pain  is constant.

He has said so plainly, without   self-pity, in the matter-of-fact way he says most  things. He moves more slowly. He works when the   work interests him and the physical requirements  are manageable. He spends time at his ranch in   Mississippi — 124 acres in the state that once  tried to tell him he was worth nothing — where   he keeps twenty-six beehives and tends them  with the patience of a man who has learned   that stillness is not the same as stopping.

When he talks about The Shawshank Redemption now,   after thirty years, what he comes back to  is not the Oscar nomination it earned him,   though he received one. He does not speak  about the box office resurrection or the cable   television phenomenon or the IMDb ranking that has  kept it at the very top of the list since 2008.   What he comes back to, in the careful honest way  he has of circling a truth before landing on it,   is the friendship.

His friendship with Tim  Robbins, formed in the yard of an Ohio reformatory   in the summer of 1993, sustained across three  decades of separate careers and separate lives,   still present whenever the two of them find  themselves in the same room. There is an ease   to it that has nothing to perform. It is the  ease of men who made something real together   and never needed to talk about it much afterward,  because the thing they made says everything.

And perhaps what he comes back to most, when he  lets himself, is the idea that the script was   right. That the whole thing — the fifty years of  waiting, the closed doors, the invisible decades,   the long patient accumulation of craft in the face  of indifference — was building toward a role that   required exactly what his life had made him.

Red  was a man who had survived by going inward and   still kept a light on. Red was a man who had been  inside a long time and not been destroyed by it.   Red was the voice people needed to believe that  getting busy living was still an option, no matter   how long you had spent being busy surviving. Morgan Freeman had been preparing to play that   man since he was nine years old on a stage in  Mississippi.

And when the moment finally came,   in a real prison in Ohio in the summer of 1993,  he threw a baseball for nine hours and showed up   the next morning with his arm in a sling and  didn’t say a word about it. Because that was   the work. And the work, always, was the thing. If this story moved you — if Morgan Freeman’s   voice has ever reached you through a screen and  made you feel, for a moment, that wisdom and   dignity and the stubborn refusal to stop hoping  are still real things in this world — leave a   comment below. We read every one of them. And here  is the question we want to leave you with today:   Is there a film that arrived in your life at  exactly the right moment, the way Shawshank   seems to arrive for so many people, and changed  something in how you saw your own road ahead?   Tell us. Because that is what the best stories  are for. And we will see you in the next one.