On September 13th, 2004, exactly 10 years to the day after President Clinton had signed the federal assault weapons weapons ban into law, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed California’s AB 50, the .50 caliber BMG Regulation Act of 2004. It was the first state law in American history to ban the civilian sale of a specific rifle caliber.
Existing owners had until April 30th, 2006, to register their weapons with the California Department of Justice or surrender them. It’s law enforcement agencies were exempted. They could still purchase the rifles freely. Barrett published an open letter to LAPD Chief William Bratton in 2005. The argument was constitutional, but the operative sentence was operational.
Barrett cannot legally sell any of its products to lawbreakers. Keep When LAPD SWAT requested service on their M82, he told them to send someone to collect it. He refused to touch it. In April 2005, Senator Feinstein introduced S. 935, the .50 caliber sniper weapons regulation act of 2005, co-sponsored by John Corzine and Dick Durbin.
Keep The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Finance. It did not receive a committee vote. Federal campaign to restrict the M82 through legislation produced two Senate bills, a California state ban, a District of Columbia ban, and no federal law. The Barrett M82, standardized by the US military as the M107, remained in production in Murfreesboro, Tennessee.
It remained in active service with the US Army, Marine Corps, Air Force, and the military forces of more than 60 nations. In 2005, the same year Senator Feinstein introduced her second regulation bill, the US Army named the Barrett M82 one of the top 10 greatest inventions in its history. Ronnie Barrett received that designation with the same temperament he’d applied to everything else in the rifle’s career.
He was a man who had started from nothing, no degree, no institutional backing, no inherited knowledge of firearms manufacturing, and had, by the time of that Army recognition, built a company whose product had entered the permanent operational vocabulary of modern warfare. He had designed the recoil system at a table in Tennessee.
He had worked Christmas week to fulfill the Marine Corps order for Desert Storm. He had told the LAPD to come and collect its rifle. The Army’s acknowledgement confirmed what the rifle’s two two decades of service had already established. Barrett framed the certificate and kept it. Sugarman continued, “Criminal use data remained near zero.
His position was not that the threat had been resolved. His position was that it had not yet arrived. The federal bills never passed. The M82 was never classified alongside machine guns. Civilian buyer in 47 states could still walk into a licensed dealer, pass an instant background check, and purchase the most powerful shoulder-fired semi-automatic rifle in American military service.
In the two states that had banned it, California and later Hawaii, small enforcement exemptions ensured that the same government agencies whose officers had testified the ban could could still acquire the rifles freely. Ronnie Barrett’s response to that asymmetry had been clear and documented and on the company website for anyone to read. He had not modulated it.
Somewhere tonight, a shooter settles behind a Barrett M82 thinking only about the steel target at the far end of the range. In a California armory, the same rifle sits in a law enforcement rack exempted from the law that keeps it from him. The argument is still running. already had the M2 Browning for heavy suppression and was not obviously in the market for a semi-automatic anti-material rifle. First significant
military sale came in 1989 when the Swedish Army purchased a consignment of M82A1 rifles designating them the AG90. It was an unusual sequence for an American military design. A foreign adoption preceding the domestic one. And it reflected both the conservatism of military procurement and the genuinely unconventional nature of what Barrett had built.
That conservatism ended in January 1991. The United States Marine Corps, preparing for operations in the Persian Gulf, placed an order for 100 M82A1 rifles. T. Ronnie Barrett and his team at Barrett Firearms Manufacturing in Murfreesboro worked through the Christmas week of 1990 to fulfill the order.
The rifles shipped to Saudi Arabia in the days before Operation Desert Storm began. US forces used them in combat to engage Iraqi target vehicles, radar installations, materiel at distances up to 1,600 m. Standard the cartridge of most American sniper rifles at the time, was considered accurate in trained hands to approximately 800 m under field conditions. The M82, firing the .
Advertisements
50 BMG, doubled that effective range and added the ability to destroy hard targets that a conventional sniper rifle could not penetrate. And sold.i.ers described the psychological effect on enemy forces who watched materiel destroyed by fire they could neither see nor locate. The Army and Air Force placed procurement orders shortly after the Marine Corps.
T- The end of Desert Storm the M82 had demonstrated a battlefield capability that had not previously existed at the individual sold.i.er level. The Army named it in 2005 one of the top 10 greatest inventions in its history. Josh Sugarman had been watching this trajectory for years. The Violence Policy Center he had founded in Washington in 1988 operated on a specific methodology.
Identify a category of firearms that Sugarman believed posed a disproportionate public safety risk. Document that risk through research and published reports and bring that documentation to legislative allies who could translate it into policy. He had used this approach to help shape the 1994 federal assault weapons ban, which Senator Dianne Feinstein of California had co-authored.
The ban, which Sugarman had argued was weaker than needed but represented achievable progress, prohibited certain cosmetic features on semi-automatic rifles and banned the manufacture of new high-capacity magazines for civilian sale. Expired in 2004 without renewal. The .50 caliber campaign was a different argument in structure.
Sugarman’s position was not that Barrett’s rifle had been used in mass shootings or ordinary crimes. It had not been, and the data showed almost no criminal’s use of any .50 BMG rifle. Position was prospective and strategic. A rifle accurate to 1,800 m, capable of penetrating light armor and bulk fuel storage tanks, available at retail to any American who could pass a standard firearms background check, was not a hunting rifle or a target rifle in any meaningful sense.
It was, in Sugarman’s analysis, a military-grade anti-material weapon that the legislative framework governing civilian firearms had simply not anticipated when it was written. The question was not whether the rifle had been misused. The question was what would happen when it was. October 2001 report made the argument with the specific fact density that was the Violence Policy Center’s signature.
It documented the purchase of at least .25.50 BMG rifles in the United States during the 1980s by Al-Qaeda operatives during the period when US covert operations in Afghanistan had made such purchases legal and operationally adjacent to American foreign policy. Described the capability of the .
50 BMG cartridge against commercial aircraft at range, against bulk fuel storage facilities, against components of the national electrical grid. Described the rifle’s accuracy at distances that made conventional security parameters meaningless. A shooter a mile from a target is outside the range at which most protective details can respond.
Named the Barrett M82 specifically. The report’s title linked the rifle directly to Osama bin Laden. The report was published six weeks after September 11th, 2001. Senator Feinstein introduced the Military Sniper Weapon Regulation Act, designated S.505, in the Senate on March 9th, 2001. Co-sponsored by Senators Charles Schumer and Carl Levin of Michigan.
The bill would have reclassified .50 BMG rifles under the National Firearms Act, treating them the same as machine guns and sawed-off shotguns, requiring registration with the federal government, payment of a $200 transfer tax, and a background investigation beyond the standard instant check. It would not have banned the rifles.
It would have made purchasing one substantially more difficult and placed existing owners on a federal registry. T The bill was referred to the Senate Finance Committee, where it remained without a vote. S- Barrett’s response to the campaign against his rifle was not to hire lobbyists or issue measured public statements through a communications department, was to write letters.
In communications to the California State Assembly in 2002 and 2003, Barrett addressed the claims of the Violence Policy Center with the precision of a man who had built the rifle and understood exactly what it could and could not do. He identified specific factual errors in the VPC’s characterizations of the weapon’s capabilities.
He noted, with a degree of irony that went unremarked in the legislative record, that California state law did not allow the sale of the M82A1 to civilians under the existing assault weapons definition, which meant the LAPD SWAT team was already operating a rifle that the same law prohibited its citizens from owning. California State Assembly’s Public Safety Committee rejected AB 2222, a ban on .
50 caliber rifles, by a vote of 5 to 0 with one abstention in March 2002. Sugarman returned in 2003. In private, both men held positions more nuanced than the ones they argued in public. Barrett, who marketed the M82 as a target and sporting rifle, had originally sold it to civilians as a long-range competition platform and had always been candid about the weapon’s military heritage.
In the VPC’s own published report, a Barrett promotional quote was cited verbatim. The rifle, Barrett said in a retail context, was accurate at ranges where the human body could not be reliably identified as a threat. He had said this to sell rifles, not to undermine his own litigious little position. But the words were precise.
He was not claiming the rifle was a deer gun. Sugarmann, for his part, acknowledged in internal communications and published asides that .50 BMG rifles had not been the instrument of any domestic mass shooting. And that the criminal use data was essentially zero. His argument was about capability and future risk, not current harm.
In his own public statements, he was careful to describe the threat in prospective terms. T- Neither man was arguing in bad faith. They were arguing from genuinely different epistemologies about what the word danger required before it justified a legislative response. California campaign continued through 2003 and into 2004. The Violence Policy Center published successive reports.
Sitting Ducks, in August 2002, on the threat to chemical refineries from .50 BMG fire. Just like bird hunting, in January 2003, on the threat to commercial aviation. Really Big Guns, Even Bigger Lies, in March 2004, responding to the firearms industry’s counter research. January 2005, CBS News 60 Minutes ran a segment drawing heavily on VPC research, interviewing both Sugarmann’s colleague Tom Diaz and Ronnie Barrett.
On September 13th, 2004, exactly 10 years to the day after President Clinton had signed the federal assault weapons ban into law, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed California’s AB 50, the .50 caliber BMG Regulation Act of 2004. It was the first state law in American history to ban the civilians in sale of a specific rifle caliber.
Existing owners had until April 30th, 2006, to register their weapons with the California Department of Justice or surrender them. S- Law enforcement agencies were exempted. They could still purchase the rifles freely. Barrett published an open letter to LAPD Chief William Bratton in 2005. The argument was constitutional, but the operative sentence was operational.
Barrett cannot legally sell any of its products to lawbreakers. K- When LAPD SWAT requested service on their M82, he told them to send someone to collect it. He refused to touch it. In April 2005, Senator Feinstein introduced S. 935, the .50 caliber sniper weapons regulation act of 2005, co-sponsored by John Corzine and Dick Durbin.
T- The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Finance. It did not receive a committee vote. Federal campaign to restrict the M82 through legislation produced two Senate bills, a California state ban, a District of Columbia ban, and no federal law. T- The Barrett M82, standardized by the U.S. military as the M107, remained in production in Murfreesboro, Tennessee.
T- Remained in active service with the U.S. T- Army, Marine Corps, Air Force, and the military forces of more than 60 nations. In 2005, the same year Senator Feinstein introduced her second regulation bill, the U.S. Army named the Barrett M82 one of the top 10 greatest inventions in its history. T- Ronnie Barrett received that designation with the same temperament he had applied to everything else in the rifle’s career.
He was a man who had started from nothing, no degree, no institutional backing, no inherited knowledge of firearms manufacturing, and had, by the time of that Army recognition, built a company whose product had entered the permanent operational vocabulary of modern warfare. He had designed the recoil system at a table in Tennessee.
He had worked Christmas week to fulfill the Marine Corps order for Desert Storm. He had told the lab to come and collect
