Before the wedding, there was a document. The negotiations took place in the weeks before October 20th, 1968. On one side sat Ted Kennedy, the last surviving brother, and Andre Meyer, a senior partner at Lazard Fra, who managed Jackie’s finances. On the other side sat Aristotle Onasses, and his lawyers.
What they were settling was not the terms of a life together. They were settling the terms of an arrangement, and the difference mattered. By the time the document was finished, its logic was precise. $3 million paid to Jacqueline Kennedy before the wedding. $1 million to her daughter Caroline, $1 million to her son John. In the event of Aristotle’s death, $150,000 per year from his estate for the remainder of her life.
These were not small numbers in 1968. They were not offered out of sentiment. They were offered because both sides understood without saying so directly that this was the correct way to structure what was being built. A Greek shipping magnate of Onass’s standing did not enter arrangements casually, and a woman in Jackie’s position did not either.
The document said in the language documents use that her safety had a price and that the price had been agreed upon. There was one detail in the accounting that did not appear in most press accounts of the marriage. Jackie was already entitled to $150,000 from the Kennedy family trust. She had been entitled to it since November 1963.
Part of the financial arrangement that followed her husband’s assassination. Remarrying voided that entitlement. The $3 million Onasis paid before the wedding was in part compensation for money she was giving up by leaving. Before this negotiation, Jackie’s financial life had been organized around what the Kennedy family provided, which meant it was organized around what the Kennedy family decided.
She had been expected to appear at Bobby’s campaign events. She had been expected to maintain a public posture consistent with the family’s political interests. The money and the expectations were not separate things. The men who negotiated on her behalf, Ted Kennedy among them, were the same men whose family structure she was trying to gain some distance from.
They sat across the table and helped price her exit from a world they controlled. The exit cost her something she already owned. To understand why she signed it, you have to go back 4 months. Robert Kennedy was shot at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles on June 5th, 1968. He died the following morning. Jackie had been present for one assassination.
She had managed the aftermath of one assassination, the funeral, the burial, the public grief, the careful construction of a narrative that would hold the Kennedy name in the national memory. She was not going to manage another. In the weeks after Bobby’s death, the FBI passed along reports of death threats directed at her children.
She told friends she was certain that someone was working through the Kennedy family one by one. her exact words as recorded by people close to her. They’re playing 10 little Indians and I don’t want to be next. Her friend Bunny Melon asked her directly why she was doing it. Why Onasis? Why now? Why this? Jackie’s answer was not romantic.
She said she had no choice. What Onases could offer was specific. He had a private island in the Ionian Sea with its own security. He had homes in Paris, Athens, and New York. He had a yacht, the Christina, that could move her anywhere in the world on short notice. He had the kind of money that does not require permission from government agencies or family trusts or secret service schedules.
He had, in the plainest terms, the ability to put physical distance between her children and whatever she believed was coming. The document that Ted Kennedy helped negotiate was the formal expression of that offer. Safety priced and signed. On October 20th, 1968, Jacquellyn Kennedy married Aristotle Onassus in a Greek Orthodox ceremony on Scorpios.
Advertisements
Photographs from that afternoon show a small group on a wooded island, a church, an overcast sky. Onassus is 62 years old, or possibly older. His passport had discrepancies that his own associates acknowledged. Jackie is 39. Her children are present. The ceremony is conducted in Greek, which she does not speak fluently.
The press is kept off the island, though photographers with long lenses captured images from boats in the surrounding water. The American reaction when the news reached the United States was immediate and sharp. One London tabloid ran the headline, “Jackie Mary’s blank check.” A Rome paper declared that JFK dies a second time.
In the United States, the coverage ranged from dismay to a kind of shocked ribbled. None of that reaction appears in the document. The document does not account for public opinion. It accounts for money and for what money was understood to purchase and for the schedule of payments in the event that the arrangement ended.
What it did not account for, what no one in that negotiation appears to have raised, was a consequence that existed in federal law and that would take effect the moment she signed the marriage certificate. That consequence was not in the $3 million. It was not in the annual payments. It was not in the careful financial architecture that Ted Kennedy helped build on her behalf.
It was something else entirely and it was already waiting. There is a line in federal law that governs what a former president’s widow is entitled to receive from the government. In 1968, that line included Secret Service protection. It was not optional and it was not symbolic. Since November 23rd, 1963, the day after Dallas, Jackie Kennedy had moved through the world with a federal security detail.
Agents at her residence, agents with her children, a level of surveillance and response capability that no private arrangement could fully replicate because it drew on the resources of the United States government and operated under its legal authority. These were not bodyguards in the conventional sense. They were federal agents with communication infrastructure connecting them in real time to resources that private security firms cannot access.
They knew her routes before she traveled them. They coordinated with local law enforcement in every city she visited. When her children went to school, agents were positioned at the school. When she traveled, the detail traveled with her. The system had been built around a specific and documented threat environment and it operated continuously, not on a schedule that anyone outside the government could predict or disrupt.
The legal mechanism that ended this was not complicated. A presidential widow retained her protection unless she remarried. Remarriage voided the entitlement. Whatever the reasoning behind that provision, the practical effect was immediate. On October 20th, 1968, the moment Jacqueline Kennedy became Jacquellyn Onasses, the federal protection that had followed her for 5 years ended.
Not gradually, not after a transition period. At the moment of remarage, she had negotiated $3 million for her safety. She had not negotiated to keep what she already had. What replaced it? After October 20th was Onasis’s private security, he had money enough to hire capable people, and he did. His island had controlled access. His yacht had staff.
His residences had guards. But private security operates on different terms than federal protection. It is funded at the discretion of whoever is paying for it. It has no authority beyond what local law provides. It cannot call on federal resources. It is in the end a service that continues for as long as the person paying for it chooses to continue paying or is alive to make that choice.
Federal protection is a legal entitlement. Private security is a contract. Onasis understood presumably that Jackie’s security was part of what the marriage required. It was implicit in everything the prenuptual represented. The island, the yacht, the multiple residences, the ability to move her and her children anywhere in the world on short notice.
He had positioned himself and been positioned by the negotiation as the structure that would keep her safe. What neither the document nor the negotiation appears to have addressed was the federal protection she was forfeiting by entering that structure. The lawyers on both sides were focused on what Onassis would provide.
No one in the surviving record raised what she would give up. She had wanted to leave. She had wanted distance, physical and financial, from the world that had produced Dallas and the Ambassador Hotel. She had found a man with an island and a fleet and the resources to build a perimeter around her life. She had paid for that arrangement with the Kennedy family trust money she was already owed and she had signed documents giving the arrangement legal form.
And she had stood in a Greek Orthodox church on a private island while photographers with long lenses shot from boats in the surrounding water. And in the same moment that the arrangement became official, the protection she had carried for 5 years, the protection that predated Onasses that did not depend on him, that no discretionary decision of his could touch was gone.
In the years that followed, Jackie would spend considerable time in New York, where her children were in school. She moved through the city the way anyone moves through a city, which is to say, without a federal security detail, clearing routes ahead of her and without agents at fixed positions around her building. What her particular circumstances included in those years was a freelance photographer named Ron Galella who had identified her as his primary subject and who had the time, the equipment, and apparently the patience to pursue that
subject through the streets of Manhattan and Central Park and wherever else she appeared. Gala had been photographing her since 1967. After October 20th, 1968, the limits on his access were different. Ron Galella had been photographing Jackie since 1967. By the time she married Onasses, he had already identified her as his primary subject, not one among many, but the organizing center of his professional life.
He said so himself in various interviews across various years without apparent embarrassment. He tracked her movements through Manhattan the way someone tracks a schedule. He knew her building. He knew her routes. He knew her children’s schools and the parks where they played and the restaurants where she ate and the streets she was likely to cross on any given afternoon.
His methods were not passive. He wore disguises to get closer than he would have been allowed otherwise. He used a speedboat to follow her when she swam pulling alongside near enough that she could not ignore him. He stationed himself outside her building on Fifth Avenue for hours at a time waiting.
He hired a man in a Santa Claus costume to try to force a staged encounter close enough for photographs. In Central Park in September 1969, he jumped into the path of John Kennedy Jr.’s bicycle to get a closer shot. The boy swerved. Secret Service agents, still protecting the children at that point under a separate legal provision, arrested Gala for what followed.
He sued the agents for false arrest. Jackie counters sued for harassment. That counter suit became the 1972 trial. The trial ran for six weeks in federal district court in New York. Gala’s position was that he was a working photojournalist exercising First Amendment rights, that public figures moving through public spaces were legitimate subjects for news photography, that his presence near Jackie and her children was no different in principle from any other press coverage of a public figure.
The court did not agree with that characterization in full and the distinction it drew matters. There is no first amendment right that provides absolute immunity to newspaping news. The right to photograph does not include the right to jump in front of a child’s bicycle. Jackie’s testimony in that trial is worth staying with because it is the most unguarded account of her daily life that exists in the public record.
She did not speak often and when she did she was careful. In that courtroom, she was specific. She said his pursuit caused her anguish. She said it caused her fear for her safety and for the safety of her children. She used the word terror. She said there was no peace, no peace of mind. And she said this, it caused a feeling of being imprisoned in your house.
Imprisoned in your house. She had spent $3 million and married one of the richest men alive in part to feel less afraid. She was describing what her life felt like from inside a building she owned on Fifth Avenue in New York City. The court found in her favor. Gala’s claims were dismissed. The judge issued a restraining order requiring him to stay 100 yards from Jackie and her children.
Gala appealed and the appellet court modified the distances 25 ft from Jackie, 30 ft from the children on the grounds that the original order was broader than necessary to address the specific harm. 25 ft in a city the size of New York with a photographer who had already demonstrated that he would use boats and disguises and jump in front of a child’s bicycle 25 ft is not a large number. He violated the order.
Jackie returned to court in 1982, a decade after the original trial, arguing contempt. The second proceeding resulted in a settlement. Gala paid $10,000 and permanently surrendered his right to photograph Jackie and her children. By that point, she had spent the better part of 15 years in active legal conflict with a single photographer over her right to move through a city without being followed.
Among the photographs Gala took of Jackie during those years before and after the restraining order, one image became the most reproduced photograph of her post-w life. He took it on Madison Avenue in 1971. She is walking, her coat moving in the wind, her hair blown sideways, her expression caught between composure and something less settled.
He called it Windblown Jackie. Time magazine later named it one of the most influential photographs of the 20th century. It is in the permanent collection of the Museum of Modern Art. It is the image most people picture when they picture Jackie in those years. Not the White House years, not Scorpios, but this one, a woman on a New York street caught without her permission by a man.
A court would find the following year to have subjected her to sustained harassment. The image and the harassment are not two different stories about the same period. They are the same story. After the 1972 restraining order, he came back anyway. She returned to court in 1982. The marriage and practice looked like this.
Six residences. Jackie’s 15 room apartment at 1045th Avenue in Manhattan, which remained her primary home. A horse farm in Peepac Gladstone, New Jersey. Aristotle’s apartment on Avenue Foch in Paris. a house in Athens, a house on Scorpios, the yacht Christina which moved between them. During school terms, Jackie was in New York with Caroline and John.
During that same time, Aristotle was generally in Europe running a shipping empire that required his presence and his decisions in ways that a marriage this particular marriage did not. He maintained an office in Monte Carlo. His tanker fleet required oversight across multiple continents. The business had not paused for the wedding and it did not pause afterward.
They came together for summers and for holidays. The rest of the year the Atlantic was between them. This is largely what the record shows. Not conflict, not intimacy, not a shared daily life of any documented kind. A schedule, an arrangement of houses and seasons and agreed upon occasions. Aristotle’s daughter Christina and his son Alexander had called Jackie a gold digger from the moment the engagement was announced and they did not revise that assessment after the wedding.
She was not absorbed into the Onasis family. She occupied a position adjacent to it present for the formal occasions absent from the interior. Maria Callis remained a fact of Aristotle’s life throughout the marriage. This was not hidden from Jackie. Nelly Mutsatsos, who worked closely with Onasses during those years, said later that Jackie was aware of the situation and chose a specific response to it.
She was never screaming, never fighting. She knew many things from his behavior, Mount Sato said. But she was pretending that nothing happened. She was very smart. There is a particular quality to that observation. Jackie had spent years performing composure in public at state dinners on foreign trips in the years after Dallas when the entire country was watching her face for information about how to feel.
That performance had a purpose and an audience. What Mount Satos was describing was the same performance conducted in private for no audience at all. A woman alone with what she knew choosing not to react to it because reaction was not part of what the arrangement required. The marriage produced no children and left almost no record of shared private life.
What it produced logistically was stability of a kind, a financial structure, a set of residences, a name that was no longer Kennedy, and enough physical distance from the United States that the specific fears of 1968 receded into something more manageable. Then in January 1973, Alexander Onassis was critically injured in a plane crash. He was 24 years old.
He survived the initial crash but never regained consciousness. He died the following month. Aristotle had built his empire with the assumption never stated but always present that Alexander would inherit it. The death did not just grieve him. It unmade something structural in how he understood his own life’s work.
People who observed him in the months that followed said he aged visibly and quickly. his health, which had been declining in smaller ways before the crash deteriorated with a speed that seemed connected to something beyond the physical. He had lost the person the fortune was for. What remained was the fortune, the marriage’s emotional center, such as it was collapsed in that period.
What continued was the arrangement. Aristotle Onases died in Paris on March 15th, 1975. Respiratory failure. He was 69 years old. His health had been declining since Alexander’s death two years earlier and by the end he required medical support that his money could provide but could not ultimately change the outcome of he died in the American hospital in Nui Cersain attended far from the island that bore his name.
Jackie was not at his bedside she was in New York. She flew to Greece for the burial on Scorpios where Aristotle was interred near the chapel where they had married 6 and 1/2 years earlier. The island was private. The funeral was not a public event in the way that Kennedy funerals had been public events. There were no heads of state, no riderless horses, no eternal flame.
There was a burial on a Greek island attended by the people who had been close to him, which did not include most of the people who would write about him in the days that followed. Jackie released a statement. It read in part, “Aristotle Onasis rescued me at a moment when my life was engulfed with shadows. We lived through many beautiful experiences together for which I will be eternally grateful.
The statement is worth reading carefully because Jackie had been writing public statements about her marriages and her losses for over a decade by that point. She knew exactly what a public statement was for and what it was not for. Rescued is a specific word choice. It positions Onasis as someone who acted on her behalf, which was true in a limited and transactional sense.
Engulfed with shadows is the kind of phrase that conveys grief without specifying its source or its shape. We lived through many beautiful experiences together, stops well short of claiming love or happiness or any particular emotional content. It is the language of someone who has learned through long practice how to say something that sounds like feeling without committing to a version of events that the record might complicate.
She had been practicing that management since November 1963. In the days after the statement, word reached the press that Aristotle had been exploring the possibility of divorcing Jackie before his death. The sourcing on this was thin, unnamed associates, leaked impressions, the kind of postumous account that is difficult to verify and impossible to refute.
Whether it was true in any formal legal sense, whether actual steps had been taken or whether the idea had simply been discussed, the record does not confirm. What the record does confirm is that Aristotle’s will left his estate to Christina, his daughter and soul heir, with provisions for other family members and staff.
Jackie’s name appeared in the context of whatever the prenuptual required. The prenuptual had promised her $150,000 per year from the estate. Greek law had other ideas. Under Greek inheritance law in 1975, a non-Greek surviving spouse’s claim on an estate was significantly constrained. The law did not simply honor whatever a prenuptual agreement specified if that agreement conflicted with Greek statutory inheritance rights.
The prenuptual had been written by American lawyers operating under American assumptions about how contracts function between parties. Greek law did not recognize those assumptions as controlling. What Greek law recognized was Christina’s position as sole heir and the specific provisions the statute made for surviving spouses who were not Greek nationals, which were considerably less generous than what the prenuptual had promised on paper.
Christina was the sole heir under Greek law, and Greek law was where this estate lived. The estate’s value was estimated at approximately $500 million. What Jackie could claim under the existing legal framework was a fraction of that. And the fraction was subject to negotiation with Christina, who had called her a gold digger for seven years and who now controlled every asset her father had accumulated across a lifetime.
The negotiation began. It would take 2 years. Christina Onasses was 24 years old when her father died. She had lost her brother two years earlier and her mother the year before that. She was now the heir to one of the world’s largest privately held fortunes and the sole counterparty in a legal negotiation with her late father’s widow.
Whatever her feelings about Jackie, she was also a businesswoman dealing with a business problem. The problem was how to resolve Jackie’s claim in a way that closed the matter completely and permanently. The solution would require Jackie to surrender something in exchange for whatever number they agreed upon. The machinery of that negotiation was already in motion before Aristotle was buried.
The negotiation lasted two years. On one side, Jackie and her lawyers, on the other, Christina Onasses and hers. The asymmetry was not subtle. Christina controlled the estate. Jackie’s leverage was limited to whatever the prenuptual could produce in a Greek legal context, which the previous two years had established was considerably less than what the document appeared to promise.
When Ted Kennedy and Andre Meyer had sat down to negotiate it in 1968, the prenuptual had been written in the confident language of a transaction between equals. The settlement negotiation took place in the language of Greek inheritance law, which was not the same language and did not produce the same results. What Jackie had been promised in the document was a structure annual payments, a claim on the estate, financial security of a specific and negotiated kind.
What she was being offered now was a number in exchange for walking away from all of it permanently. The legal phrase that governed the settlement was waving all further claims. She would accept a sum and in exchange she would surrender her right to contest the estate to litigate the prenuptual’s terms to pursue any additional claim against the Onasis holdings in any jurisdiction.
The negotiation was in the end about how large that sum would be and whether it was large enough to make the surrender worth accepting. They settled in 1977. Christina paid Jackie approximately $26 million. The estate Aristotle Onases left behind was valued at approximately $500 million.
$26 million against $500 million is about 5 cents on the dollar. The prenuptual that Ted Kennedy had negotiated, the document that had been written to protect Jackie’s financial position in the event of Aristotle’s death, had produced after 2 years of legal proceedings against a 24year-old who despised her roughly 5% of the estate’s value.
The woman, who had been called a gold digger since the engagement was announced, settled for a fraction that most actual gold diggers would have found disappointing. Christina’s interest in the settlement was clean and comprehensible. She wanted the matter closed. She wanted Jackie’s signature on a document that ended any future claim, any future litigation, any future complication arising from her father’s marriage.
$26 million was the price of that finality. From Christina’s side, it resolved a problem. From Jackie’s side, it resolved a different kind of problem. It produced financial independence. the real kind, not the kind that depends on annual payments from an estate controlled by someone who considered you an intruder. The $26 million went to Jackie.
She was 47 years old, widowed for the second time. She needed someone to manage the money. A man named Maurice Templesman, a Belgian-born diamond merchant who had known her since the Kennedy administration took on that role. He does not become central to this story yet, but he enters it here quietly as the person who would be responsible for what happened to the money the transaction had finally and incompletely produced.
She took the money, she signed the waiver, she went to work in 1975, the same year she settled into her role as a twice widowed woman with a fraction of a fortune and no federal protection and a restraining order against a photographer who kept coming back. Anyway, Jackie Kennedy Onasses took a job. The job paid $10,000 a year. She was a consulting editor at Viking Press, brought in by Tom Ginsburg, an old friend who had inherited the company from his father.
The salary was not the point. She had $26 million. She showed up. Her first assistant at Viking documented what the first morning looked like. At around 10:00, the receptionist called to report that someone in the waiting area was causing a commotion. A person who had arrived, claiming a need to see Jackie and was not being quiet about it.
This was a fairly typical morning, the assistant said. The media attention that had followed Jackie for 15 years did not pause because she had taken an office job. It recalibrated around the office. photographers outside the building, calls to the switchboard, people who felt that her presence in a publishing house was a public event rather than a woman trying to do work.
She navigated it the way she navigated most things without visible reaction, without public comment by simply continuing. She stayed at Viking for 2 years. Then the company acquired a novel about the assassination of Robert Kennedy. Jackie left. She did not make a statement about why the departure and the reason for it were the same gesture, a professional decision that was also a private one made without explanation.
In the same way that a person removes themselves from a room when the room becomes something they cannot be in. She had managed the public language around Bobby’s death in 1968. She was not going to sit in editorial meetings discussing the fictional treatment of it in 1977. In 1978, she joined Double Day as an associate editor.
Her salary eventually reached $100,000 a year, which was real money for the work, not ceremonial compensation. Her office was small, one window. She answered her own phone. When she needed the copy room, she waited in line for it like everyone else on the floor. The editorial meetings at Double Day happened every Wednesday. Editors came in with their projects, presented them to the room, and made the case for acquisition.
Jackie attended these meetings. She was not a figurehead presence in them. Colleagues who worked with her at Double Day described a specific atmosphere her presence created. Not intimidating exactly, but clarifying. One editor said that as long as Mrs. Onassus was on staff, they had to comport themselves. They had to try to aspire to her lead.
They couldn’t do anything to embarrass her. What she actually did in that office across nearly two decades was acquire books, close to a hundred of them. Kelsey Kirkland’s memoir about her years as a dancer and her addiction, Dancing on My Grave, which Jackie fought for internally against resistance and which became a bestseller.
The companion book to Bill Moyer’s Conversations with the mythologist Joseph Campbell, The Power of Myth, which shephered to publication and which has remained in print ever since. Michael Jackson’s autobiography Moonwalk, which required years of editorial attention and produced after multiple ghost writers and numerous visits from Jackson himself, a book that sold in the millions.
She asked a colleague after one of Jackson’s visits with what the colleague described as genuine curiosity. Do you think he likes girls? At some point in the early editorial meetings at Double Day, Jackie proposed publishing what she called an American playad. The playatti is a French series. All the major authors of a literary tradition published in uniform hardcover editions collected and permanent.
She wanted the same thing for American literature. The idea did not move forward at Double Day at the time. Approximately 10 years later, the Library of America was founded on essentially the same principle. It is now one of the most significant publishing institutions in the United States. the closest thing American literature has to an official canon in print.
The idea has no famous origin story attached to it. It came from a Wednesday editorial meeting in a small office on the double day floor proposed by a woman who answered her own phone and waited in line for the copy machine. On Martha’s Vineyard where Jackie spent summers, she had a neighbor named Dorothy West. West was in her 80s, had been writing since the Harlem Renaissance, and had a novel she had not finished.
Jackie encouraged her to complete it. She acquired it for double day. The wedding was published in 1995, the year after Jackie died. West acknowledged her in the front piece. Oprah Winfrey later adapted it for television. The last surviving member of the Harlem Renaissance finished her final novel because her neighbor on Martha’s Vineyard asked her to.
In 1980, at a dinner party, the poet, Steven Spender, asked Jackie what she considered her greatest achievement. She thought about the question. Her answer was, “I kept my sanity.” In January 1994, she was diagnosed with non-Hodgkins lymphoma. She continued going to the office. She read manuscripts while receiving chemotherapy.
Norman Mailor called her the prisoner of celebrity. She did not stop working until she could not. Maurice Templesman had been in Jackie’s life longer than most people realized. He was a Belgian-born diamond merchant and industrialist who had first connected with the Kennedy world in the 1950s when his business dealings brought him into contact with Senator Kennedy and the circles around him.
He and his wife Lily had been guests at the White House during the Kennedy administration. By the time Jackie’s relationship with him became something more than friendship in 1980, she had known him for nearly 20 years. He was still married to Lily when the relationship began. He separated from her in 1984, but Lily’s Orthodox Jewish faith made divorce impossible under the terms she observed.
And so Templesman remained legally married throughout the 14 years he spent with Jackie. He moved into her apartment at 1045th Avenue in 1988. The New York Times in its coverage of Jackie’s death in 1994 described him as having been quietly at her side. That is the paper of records characterization of a man who had been living in her home for 6 years.
He was not a public figure in any meaningful sense. He did not seek coverage. When a gossip columnist reported that he and Jackie were planning to marry, he secured a retraction. The relationship existed in a register that almost nothing in Jackie’s adult life had been permitted to exist in genuinely structurally private.
Not because the press had agreed to ignore it, but because Templesmen had no appetite for visibility and considerable ability to avoid it. A friend of Jackie’s described him this way. He doesn’t show her off like Onasis, who considered Jackie another jewel in his crown. Maurice, the diamond merchant, knows better. He protects her, understands her position, and respects her privacy.
He also managed her money. The $26 million she had received from the Christina settlement under his financial stewardship grew to an estimated $45 million by the time she died. When Jackie died on the evening of May 19th, 1994, the official statement identified three family members who had been present.
Two were her children, Caroline and John. The third was Templesman. He had been legally married to someone else the entire time they were together. The public learned the full weight of his place in her life, primarily from that fact, from his presence in the room, and then from his presence 5 days later at the funeral at Street Ignatius Loyola on Park Avenue, where he stood alongside her children and read from the Greek poet Cavi. The poem was Ithaca.
When he finished the poem, he added his own words, and now the journey is over. Too short, alas, too short. It was filled with adventure and wisdom, laughter, and love. gallantry and grace. So farewell, farewell. She died at home after Dallas, after Scorpios, after the Gala courtroom and the Christina negotiation and 19 years of editorial meetings.
She died on the evening of May 19th, 1994 in her apartment at 1045th Avenue in the building she had lived in since she left Washington. She was 64 years old. Caroline and John were there. Templesman was there. She was buried at Arlington National Cemetery beside John F. Kennedy and beside the two children who had not survived infancy, Arabella, still born in 1956, and Patrick who lived 2 days in 1963.
The plot had been planned specifically deliberately in the days immediately following the assassination. Which means that every arrangement she made in the 31 years between Dallas and her death, the Onasis marriage, the prenuptual, the settlement, the double day office, the 14 years with Templesman existed inside a life that had already decided in November 1963 where it would end.
In July 1999, John F. Kennedy Jr. went down in a plane crash off Martha’s Vineyard. He was 38. His ashes were scattered at sea. His absence completed something. The last person who had been in the car in Dallas as a child, who had saluted on the steps of Street Matthews Cathedral, who had grown up inside the public wait of that event, was gone.
What remained was the record. The record includes a manuscript she left behind with instructions that it not be released for 100 years. A woman who spent the better part of three decades in active legal and logistical struggle to keep the public out of her private life left at the end of it one final room with the door closed. No one alive will open it.
It also includes Dorothy West’s acknowledgement in the frontest piece of the wedding published the year after Jackie died. It includes the library of America which has no famous origin story. It includes the cavi poem templesman read at the funeral and the words he added at the end which were his
