Posted in

Queen Elizabeth II Only Became a Person After 2002 — Six Years to Bond, Twenty to Paddington D

On the morning of the 9th of April, 2002, Queen Elizabeth II walked behind the coffin of her mother into Westminster Abbey. She had been on the throne for 50 years and one month. She had been the daughter of Elizabeth Bose’s lion for 75 years and 10 months. In the weeks that followed, the country read the obituaries, the most loved royal of the 20th century, the icon, the jin, the smile, the pastel hat.

In the four months that followed, in private, the queen began very quietly to do small things that had not been possible for her in five decades. She kept a comedy diary. She watched the royal family with the lights low. She joked in front of three witnesses that the corgis missed her mother, but in the way one misses a noisy neighbor.

None of it appeared in the press. 10 years on, she put on a Christmas Eve cocktail dress and met Daniel Craig in the palace as a Bond girl. None of that was possible before April 2002. This is the story of the 6 years it took the queen to become a person and the 55 years her mother stopped her. Begin with the fact the country never quite assembled even though every piece of it was on the front page.

Elizabeth II was crowned in 1952. She died in 2022. That is 70 years on the throne. Inside those 70 years sits a smaller stranger number 50. The number of years the Queen Mother lived past her husband. The number of years she stayed in Clarence House. In Royal Lodge at Windsor, on the telephone every morning to her daughter, in the lunches at Buckingham Palace, in the family weekends at Sandringham.

50 years of widowhood. 50 years in which she had no constitutional role and an enormous social one. 50 years in which the daughter who had become queen at 25 was the junior matriarch in every room her mother also stood in. William Shakross who wrote the queen mother’s official biography with full access to the family’s papers recorded the small daily mechanism.

Mother and daughter spoke almost every morning by telephone. Staff at Buckingham Palace later said that the calls helped the queen keep her composure during the bad years, the divorces, the press wars, the fire at Windsor. Diana. The calls were how the queen mother stayed the senior figure she had been at 26 when the abdication put her on a throne she had not expected and which she never quite stopped occupying even after her husband died and her daughter took the constitutional place.

The queen mother kept the family standard. The queen ran the country. Whose house this was in the family sense was never in doubt. Now hold that fact in mind because there is another one beside it. Elizabeth II in the first 50 years of her reign never appeared in a comedy sketch.

She never publicly laughed at herself. She never sang along to a popular song. She never danced. There is no footage of the first half of her reign in which she behaves with the warmth the country would later come to know. Every photograph from that era shows the same posture. Upright, gloved, attentive, immaculate, contained.

The country was used to it. Documentaries praised it as discipline. Foreign visitors called it dignity. The British public understood it as duty. Nobody in the broad sheet press in those decades asked whether the discipline was hers or whether it had been taught to her by somebody else.

The marshmallow with the steel inside it, as Cecilele Beaton put it, was always understood to be the mother. The daughter was assumed to be plain steel. The first revision of that assumption began very quietly in 2002. Marian Crawford was born in 1909 in Scotland. In 1933, when Princess Elizabeth was 7 and Princess Margaret was three, Crawford was hired as their governness.

The girls called her Coffee. She lived in the household for 16 years. She watched the abdication from inside the family. She watched the small Elizabeth become by accident the heir to the throne. She watched the queen mother, who had married a second son and become a queen consort against her own wishes, decide that her elder daughter would be raised with the steadiest possible hand.

Crawy left royal service in 1949 and was given a grace and favor cottage at Kensington Palace as a retirement gift. Then she did something the family had not anticipated. She wrote a book. In 1949, she collaborated with a ghostwriter on a memoir of her 16 years inside the household.

The book described the small humor of the girls. It described Princess Elizabeth’s seriousness and Princess Margaret’s mischief. It described the king’s moods. It described the household’s small private rituals. It was not malicious. It was not sensational. It was warmly observational. According to the contract Crawford had signed, she did not require the Queen’s consent to publish, though the Queen Mother had earlier signaled vaguely that anonymity might preserve the family’s view of the matter. The serialization appeared in the Lady’s Home Journal in America in early 1950. Woman’s own bought the UK rights for £30,000, an extraordinary sum in 1950 money. When the Queen Mother, then Queen Elizabeth, the consort of George V 6th, saw the proof pages, she told the publishers of the Lady’s Home Journal that Crawford

had gone off her head. The publishers proceeded. What the Queen Mother did next is on the historical record. She evicted Crawford from her Grace and Favor cottage. She ordered the household, the family, the entire royal circle to sever contact. She herself never spoke to Crawford again. Neither did her elder daughter.

Crawford retired to Aberdine. She bought a house 200 yards from the road that runs to Balmoral. For decades, the royal family drove past her front door on their summer journey north. None of them ever stopped. Crawford’s husband died in the late 1970s. Shortly afterwards, she attempted to take her own life.

She died in 1988 having spent the second half of her life as a non-person to the household she had loved. The lesson to the elder princess was clear and it was learned permanently. The public revelation of royal personality, the small humor, the mischief, the affection between sisters, the laughter at the dinner table was a betrayal.

It cost a woman her home, her income, her place in the only family she had served, and eventually her wish to live. The Queen Mother had set the rule, and she had enforced it with absolute consistency, and Princess Elizabeth had watched it happen at the age of 23, 3 years before she ascended. Whatever the new queen’s private personality was, in 1952, the public version of it would be sealed. For half a century it was.

Now consider what that meant in practice. Inside the first decades of the reign, two principles ran in parallel. The constitutional principle that the monarch belonged to the public and would not be heard in any unguarded voice and the family principle that the queen mother was the senior figure, the family standard, the woman whose taste defined what was permissible and what was common.

The Queen Mother had been very clear across her decades as consort and widow on what she considered common. Television comedy in which the family’s manners were imitated was common. Press exposure of family weekends was common. Royal performers appearing alongside variety entertainers was common. Sincere public emotion of the kind the country would later demand during the Diana week of 1997 was common.

The queen’s mother had a horror of common in the precise 1930s social sense of the word and she taught her elder daughter to share it. The result across 50 years was a queen who was understood by the country as cool, contained, gracious, and rarely fully visible. The warmth that her staff would later attest to was almost entirely offscreen.

Angela Kelly, who became the Queen’s dresser in 1994 and stayed with her for the rest of her life, said the Queen had a wicked sense of humor and was a great mimic. Kelly mentioned that the Queen could do uncannily accurate impressions of American presidents, of Tony Blair, of Boris Yelten. None of those impressions ever reached the public. They could not.

Rowan Williams, who served as Archbishop of Canterbury from 2002 to 2012, that is across the exact decade we are about to discuss, later said the Queen was extremely funny in private and was quite prepared to tease and to be teased. Not everybody who met her understood how funny she could be, Williams added, because she did not perform the funniness in public.

Alexander Armstrong, the broadcaster who knew her socially, described how the queen and one of her equaries used to send each other wickedly funny letters in which they wrote as their respective dogs. None of it reached the press. None of it could. What you had by the late ‘9s was a sealed system.

a queen who was in private a witty, mimicking, doglet letterwriting, slightly mischievous woman of 70, and a public version of the same woman who never broke character, never appeared in a sketch, never danced, never sang, never laughed visibly enough to be photographed laughing. The seal had a name, and it lived at Clarence House, and it telephoned every morning.

The seal broke on the 30th of March, 2002. The Queen mother died at 15 minutes 3 that afternoon at Royal Lodge, Windsor, aged 101. Her daughter, the Queen, and her niece, Margaret Roads, were at her side. The country, which have loved her grandmotherly icon version for half a century, queued through Westminster Hall for 4 days to file past her coffin.

The funeral on the 9th of April was the largest royal funeral the country had staged in five decades. 10 million people in the United Kingdom watched it on television. More than a million more lined the 23-mile route from central London out to St. George’s Chapel, Windsor, where the Queen Mother would be buried beside her husband, George V 6th, and her younger daughter, Princess Margaret, in the chapel that still bears the king’s name.

The abby’s tenorbell told 101 times, one for each year of the life that had just ended. A massed pipe band of 192 musicians drawn from 13 British and Commonwealth regiments accompanied the cortees. After the service, the wreath that had been placed on the coffin was lifted off and laid on the tomb of the unknown warrior, a deliberate echo of what the queen mother had done on her wedding day in 1923, when she had stopped as a bride to place her bouquet on that same tomb.

The country was being shown in every gesture of the funeral how to remember her as icon, as wartime constancy, as marshmallow with steel. The queen, 50 years and 1 month onto the throne, 75 years and almost 12 months past her birth, followed her mother’s coffin into Westminster Abbey.

Seven weeks earlier, she had buried her sister. Princess Margaret had died on the 9th of February at the age of 71. The queen had become in less than 2 months the last living child of her parents and the senior matriarch of her own family. There was nobody senior to her anymore. There would not be again. In the weeks immediately after, the country watched her closely.

The Christmas broadcast that December was a sober photograph flanked acknowledgement of her two losses. She placed pictures of her mother, her father, and her sister behind her as she spoke. The text on royal.uk preserves it. Mine were very much part of my life, she said, and always gave me their support and encouragement.

There is no mischief in those lines. There is grief contained in the public form she had spent 50 years perfecting. But something else was beginning in the small mechanism of daily life. Anne Glen Connor, who had been a maid of honor at the Queen’s coronation in 1953, who married Lord Glenn Connor in 1956, and who served as a lady in waiting inside the royal circle for decades, published her memoir, Lady in Waiting, in 2019.

Glenn Connor<unk>’s account is sympathetic to all parties. She does not portray the Queen Mother as malicious. She describes a household in which a particular standard of behavior was kept by a particular senior woman. And she notes in the careful manner royal memoirists deploy when they wish to be heard without being quoted as defamatory that the standard relaxed after that woman’s death.

Hardman, Vickers, Bedell Smith, Maher. The next generation of biographers writing in the decade after would all draw on a similar pattern. The post202 queen was the same woman, but in slightly different lighting. The interviews were a little warmer. The smiles in the photographs slightly less protocol.

The flickers of mimicry, which Angela Kelly and Rowan Williams and Alexander Armstrong all separately described as constant in private, began very occasionally to surface in public. The country did not name what was happening. The country only noticed gradually that the queen was a little less contained than they had remembered her being.

Then in 2007 came the test. It was the 10th anniversary of the death of Diana, Princess of Wales. Princess Diana had died in 1997 in the year of the Queen Mother’s most documented week of family management. The Queen’s response to Diana’s death in that week had become a national grievance.

The slow return from Balmoral, the delayed broadcast, the flag at half mast. The Queen mother had been at Balmoral with her elder daughter that week, 97 years old, working with her family on what later observers would describe as a closing of the ranks. By 2007, the Queen Mother had been dead 5 years.

The decisions about how to mark Diana’s 10th anniversary belonged to the Queen and to Princess William and Prince Harry alone. There was a memorial service at the guard’s chapel on the 31st of August, 2007. The Queen attended. Prince Philip attended. The princes had asked their grandmother to come. She came.

There was a rock concert at Wembley on the 1st of July, Diana’s birthday, organized by William and Harry. 70,000 people attended. The Queen sent a message of support. Camila, the Duchess of Cornwall, did not attend the memorial service deliberately so as not to divert attention. It was a different kind of week than the Diana week of 1997.

It was not a week the Queen Mother would have orchestrated. It was a week the Queen handled in her own way, with her grandchildren leading, and her own attendance signaled as endorsement rather than as imposition. And then, and this is where the brief becomes essential to its own argument. In 2012, the queen agreed to do something the country had never imagined possible.

5 years ago, she had said yes to a private memorial. Now, she was about to say yes to a public performance. The country was about to find out that the woman it had assumed was pure steel had a private personality that was capable of acting. Danny Bole, the film director who had been hired to direct the opening ceremony of the London Olympic Games on the 27th of July 2012, sent a request to Buckingham Palace.

He wanted the queen, the actual queen, not a body double, not a wax figure, not an animated likeness, to appear in a short film that would play on the screens above the stadium and across the world, in which Daniel Craig, playing James Bond, would escort her from the palace to the helicopter that would take her to the Olympic arena.

At the end of the short film, Bond and the Queen would jump out of the helicopter and parachute into the stadium. The queen would not actually jump. The jump would be performed by a stunt man in a duplicate dress. But the rest of the sequence, the Buckingham Palace scenes, the encounter with Craig, the line, the smile, the walk to the helicopter, would be played by the actual sovereign.

Bole later said the queen needed no convincing. He said she volunteered. He said she sent a message back to him when the producers proposed several scripted greetings that she would prefer to say, “Good evening, Mr. Bond.” Because that was the line she felt the country expected of her and the line that fit Bond’s tradition.

The production was kept absolutely secret. She did not tell her family. Prince William, the second in line to the throne, said afterwards that he watched the broadcast live in the stadium and felt the words come out of his mouth, words he later described as expletives when he realized that the woman in the helicopter with Daniel Craig was actually his grandmother.

The Buckingham Palace scenes were filmed in March and April of 2012. The filming took 3 hours. More than 130 crew were involved. The corgis were in the scene. Monty, the oldest of the corgis, took a central role. He would die 6 weeks after the broadcast. Paul Wybrew, the footman known to the household as Tall Paul, the page of the backst who had served the queen since the age of 19, the longest serving member of her staff, was in the scene as himself, escorting Bond into the writing room where the queen sat at her desk. The queen wore the peach cocktail dress made for her by Angela Kelly. The dress is now an exhibition piece currently on display in 2026 at the King’s Gallery at Buckingham Palace in an exhibition

called Queen Elizabeth II: Her Life in Style. Beside it sits the duplicate dress worn by Gary Connory, the stunt man who performed the parachute jump. The two dresses, the real and the staged, in adjacent cases. the line between the woman and the performance exhibited. Watch the footage with the brief in mind and consider what is on the tape.

A 76-year-old woman who has spent 50 years sealed inside a public self that her mother had codified walks through her own house in a peach dress, addresses Daniel Craig with one perfect line of her own composition, and consents to be parachuted in spirit into the Olympic stadium for the entertainment of 27 million British viewers and the watching world. Her family had not been told.

Her family had not been told because, as William said, certain grandchildren would have told everybody too much. The queen had become at last a woman with a private joke that she alone got to set the punchline of. None of this was possible while her mother was alive. There is no record of the Queen Mother having vetoed any specific comedy invitation.

There is no published list of the sketches she said no to in the 1990s. What there is very precisely is the negative space. The 50 years in which her daughter never did anything of this kind and the 10 years after her death in which her daughter did twice. The case is circumstantial. The case is also overwhelming. In 2012, the Queen attended the royal variety performance for the last time.

She had attended that evening 39 times across her reign. The postmother decade had not changed the formal protocol of those evenings, the lineup of performers at the end, the gloved handshake, the brief exchange in which the monarch speaks first and the performer answers. What had changed was the private register beneath the protocol.

Performers who met her in those later years remembered the small flickers of warmth, the offscript aside, the small wicked oneliner, the look that suggested she had recognized something specific in the act they had just performed that the previous decades had never afforded them.

In the comedy lineup at the end, comics later said, “You could see her enjoying herself for the first time in any way that read on her face. There were public moments, too. The dry oneliner to Justin Trudeau at a Commonwealth summit. Thank you, Prime Minister, for making me feel so old. The aside to the assembled world leaders before a photograph.

Are we supposed to be looking like we are having a good time? The off- microphone remark at a state event picked up by chance in which she sounded for a moment like an actual 90-year-old grandmother making a joke about her shoes. Each of those moments individually was small. Each could be explained away as a flicker.

Together across the post 2002 decades, they made a pattern. By 2022, the country had had 20 years of a slightly different queen. The visible warmth that had been building quietly since the four months after her mother’s funeral was about to be returned to the country in its most distilled form. For her platinum jubilee, 70 years on the throne, Buckingham Palace itself proposed a short film.

The screenwriter would be Frank Catrell Boyce. The same man who had written the 2012 Olympic ceremony in which she had appeared with Daniel Craig. Catrell Boyce had co-written the Paddington screenplays with James Lamont and John Foster. The idea was that Paddington Bear would have tea with the Queen at Buckingham Palace.

The skit ran for two and a half minutes. It premiered on the 4th of June, 2022 at the Platinum Party at the Palace concert on screens above a crowd of thousands gathered outside Buckingham Palace. The queen was in her drawing room in a powder blue dress with the tea things laid out.

Paddington arrived for tea in his blue duffel coat and red felt hat and bowed. He pulled a marmalade sandwich out of his hat. A sandwich he kept there permanently, he explained, in case of emergencies. He held it out across the table. The queen looked at the sandwich. She looked at the camera. She looked back at Paddington.

Then, with the timing of a comedian who had been waiting 50 years for a straight man this good, she reached into her own black handbag. the handbag the country had spent seven decades watching her carry into stadiums and parliaments and commonwealth meetings. And she produced an identical marmalade sandwich. “So do I,” she said.

“I keep mine in here for later.” The crowd outside Buckingham Palace, watching it on the screens above the concert, laughed. Two and a half minutes earlier, they had been watching a queen they thought they understood. By the marmalade sandwich line, they were watching a person. Catrell Boyce told Variety afterwards that the queen loved acting.

He said her performance was brilliantly timed. He said she had to act with an ey line and a standin because Paddington was not actually in the room. He said the first few takes of the marmalade sandwich line were a touch too harsh. She had delivered it as a command when comedy required a confidence and she nailed it on the takes that aired.

He said the idea had originated not from external producers but from Buckingham Palace itself. 3 months later on the 8th of September 2022, the queen died at Balmoral. She was 96. The official cause was old age. The country buried her at Westminster on the 19th of September. The line in stayed at Westminster Hall between the 14th and the 19th drew a quarter of a million mourners.

Among the items left outside Buckingham Palace, beside the flowers were marmalade sandwiches. Children left them. So did adults. Prince William, asked about the tribute by a reporter, joked that Paddington had knocked the corgi off the top spot. He said the corgis would not take it well. He said it with the smile of a man whose grandmother had finally been understood in her last decade, in the way she would have understood herself in private all along.

The country was bearing the queen the country had finally been allowed to meet. This is the part the obituaries did not quite assemble. For the first 50 years of her reign, the country had loved Elizabeth II in the way one loves a dignified institution. They had loved her uprightness, her stamina, her sense of duty, her constancy.

They had not particularly loved her warmth because they had not been shown her warmth. The warmth had been a private possession sealed inside Buckingham Palace and Sandringham and Balmoral behind the protocol her mother had taught her. For the final 20 years the country fell in love with her differently.

They loved her capacity to play the joke against herself. They loved her willingness to walk through her own house in a peach dress for Daniel Craig. They loved her producing a marmalade sandwich from her handbag with the timing of a born comedian. They loved her dry oneliners. Thank you, Prime Minister, for making me feel so old to Justin Trudeau.

Are we supposed to be looking like we are having a good time to the assembled world leaders at the photo? The Washington Post obituary on the day after her death summarized the lane with one short headline. The queen, the headline said, was wickedly funny, as James Bond and Paddington Bear found out.

The headline did not say what the obituaries elsewhere never quite said. The wickedness had been there all along. The wit had been there all along. The willingness to play a comic scene had been there all along. The marshmallow with the steel inside it, the one Cecile Beaton had named for the mother, had a daughter who had inherited only the steel in public and had kept the marshmallow private for half a century.

For half a century, the woman who had taught her to keep it private was alive and on the telephone every morning and at Sunday lunch and at Christmas at Sandringham. And then for 20 years, that woman was not. The audience knows this. The most liked comment beneath one of this channel’s videos says it in eight words.

Queen Elizabeth really came to life after her mother died. Another says, “After her mother died, the queen looked more relaxed.” Another smaller, less voted. She wouldn’t have been able to do the Bond skit or the Paddington skit if her mother was around. The country had assembled the case in pieces in passing in the comment threads underneath unrelated videos long before any single biography did so as a thesis.

The country knew it had simply not been pressed to say it out loud. The biographers in the next decade will say it. The headline writers in their understanded way already have. The Washington Post said it on the 9th of September 2022. Frank Catrell Boyce said it on the same day to Variety when he praised the Queen’s comic timing.

Anne Glen Connor had said it in 2019 in the careful royal memoirist register. Angela Kelly said it in her dresser’s memoir. Rowan Williams said it in his post Archie Episcopal interviews. Alexander Armstrong said it on the chat show circuit. Each of them separately had described a queen who was private, witty, mischievous, and unafraid of playing a joke against herself.

What they did not say in those exact words is the structural part. The structural part is that for the first 50 years of her reign, the private witty queen could not become the public queen because the senior figure of her household kept the standard. And the standard was that the country would not see this.

And then in the spring of 2002, the senior figure died and the standard relaxed. And the warmth that had been on the inside of the seal began very gradually to push outward until in the peach dress with Daniel Craig in 2012, it broke through entirely in the most watched moment of British public life since the coronation. The queen mother lived to 101.

She used those years to be a beloved national figure, a wartime icon, a jin and dubet grandmother, a fixture at royal lodge and Clarence House. She also used those years very specifically to be the senior matriarch in every room her daughter, the queen, also stood in. The daughter in those rooms kept her own warmth in private.

The daughter after the matriarch died gradually stopped doing so. It is the most generous reading of the lane this channel can offer. It is the reading the audience has already supplied. It is the reading the documentary record. Bond Paddington the dog letters the impressions the dry aides to prime ministers has been quietly verifying for 20 years.

The biographers will catch up. The country in the end has already caught up. The two-line eulogy is in the comments section. Six words with 254 likes attached to them and another 50 likes for the variation underneath it. The corner of the internet that watches this channel knew the headline before the newspapers wrote it.

Queen Elizabeth II walked behind one coffin in April 2002 and was carried inside one coffin in September 2022. Between those two morning processions through Westminster, she lived 20 years and 5 months as a woman who had finally stopped explaining herself to her mother. The first decade was quiet. The second decade was the Bond girl and the marmalade sandwich.

Neither was a late blooming. Neither was a kindly old lady relaxing into retirement. Both were Elizabeth, undefended at last, doing things her mother would have called, and frequently did call common. The country loved the late queen for the warmth that emerged after 2002, without ever quite saying what the warmth had been forced to wait 50 years for.

The audience says it now. So does the documentary record. The queen mother was not a person who let her daughter be herself. She was the reason her daughter spent the first half ccentury on the throne being someone else.